1 Comment

The misrepresentations of my and others' writing appear to be the result of either not actually reading it--at least not for comprehension--or simply lying about it. But another, even more possibility exists, and that is that this crowd agrees that the lying and gaslighting antics of anti-white racists and anti-female gender activists are perfectly okay, even desirable, even though their only outcomes can be bad ones.

The other thing about the willful dismissal of older running voices is that it's not just bad marketing strategy, it makes these color-and size-crazed influencers who can barely move in a straight line or write their way out of a wet paper back look like fucking morons. Some of them genuinely are, but most have just been transfixed by Wokism and are intellectually worthless in these conversations as a result.

They know this, and it's why they do what little they can to try to limit the spread of my posts.

I can, like you say, tolerate criticism of my writing quite well (I prefer it to be on point rather than blind so I can improve) and -- unlike Wokish people -- I don't think all of my views are unassailable. But when people start the canceling and attempts at censorship -- and this is well underway, because both Murphy and Schranz's commenters have taken aim at them for sharing my stuff even without comment -- that's when I start to really fight.

And I am not a coward who makes idle threats against inanimate screen shots, nor am I in the "Let's ruin that person's life over this!" camp. But I want people to start answering for what they say and do, and I'm not the only "old" person who feels this way (and could still outrun a 10-person relay team of these shuffling goobers over any distance).

Expand full comment